Comparison of Early Versus Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After ERCP Stenting in Patients with Choledocholithiasis: A Prospective Comparative Study

Main Article Content

Dr. Senthil Kumar
Dr. Dorai
Dr. Anandhan M.S
Dr. Selvararani M.S
Mohammed Thaha S
Sahasyaa Adalarasan

Abstract

Introduction: Choledocholithiasis is a common complication where gallstones move from the gallbladder into the common bile duct or form directly in the duct, causing obstruction to bile flow and may lead to biliary obstruction, cholangitis, and pancreatitis. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is used for clearance of common bile duct stones, followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to prevent recurrence. The optimal timing of LC after ERCP remains unclear.


Methods: The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative outcomes of early versus interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP in patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis. This prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital over 12 months from 2024 to 2025. A total of 162 patients were included and divided into two groups: early LC performed within 72 hours of ERCP and interval LC performed after 6 weeks. Data were collected using a structured proforma and master chart. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. Correlation between variables was assessed using Chi square test and Fisher’s exact test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Results: A total of 162 patients were included. The mean operative time was shorter in the early LC group (65.4 ± 10.2 minutes) compared to the interval LC group (70.1 ± 11.5 minutes) (p = 0.01). Hospital stay was shorter in the early group (3.2 ± 0.8 days) compared to the interval group (4.5 ± 1.1 days) (p < 0.001). Return to normal activities was earlier in the early group (7.5 ± 2.1 days) compared to the interval group (9.8 ± 2.5 days) (p < 0.001). Dense adhesions were more common in the interval group (22.2%) compared to the early group (14.8%). Conversion to open surgery and postoperative complications were higher in the interval group but were not statistically significant. On multivariate analysis, interval LC was identified as an independent predictor of postoperative complications (p = 0.03).


Conclusion: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP is associated with shorter operative time, reduced hospitalisation duration, and faster recovery. Interval cholecystectomy is associated with increased adhesions and higher risk of complications. Early LC should be preferred in patients with choledocholithiasis.

Article Details

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Comparison of Early Versus Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After ERCP Stenting in Patients with Choledocholithiasis: A Prospective Comparative Study. (2026). Central India Journal of Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.58999/ys0zm646

References

1. Goel A, Kothari S, Bansal R. Comparative analysis of early versus late laparoscopic cholecystectomy following ERCP in cases of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2021;11(1):11-13. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1338

2. Büyükkasap Ç, Algan D, Balakji N, Karabıyık O, Altunkaya E. Early cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is feasible and safe. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(14):1407. doi:10.3390/healthcare12141407

3. Qi S, Xu J, Yan C, He Y, Chen Y. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 8;102(36):e34884. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000034884.

4. Firman FH, Harianja GA, Maulahela H. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP: an evidence-based case report. Indones J Gastroenterol Hepatol Dig Endosc. 2023;24(1):24-30. doi: 10.24871/2332022258-262

5. Mishra NK, Gupta SK. Comparative outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy following ERCP in patients with choledocholithiasis: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Cardiovasc Med. 2024;14(6):804–807. doi:10.5083/ejcm/24-06

6. Tai J. Safety and efficacy comparison of single-stage and two-stage ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Inplasy Rep. 2025 Oct 21; doi:10.37766/inplasy2025.10.0075

7. Zhang Z, Guo Z, Chen Y, Li Y. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP: a meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2023;23(1):145. doi:10.1186/s12893-023-02017-9

8. Ding GY, Zheng Y, Fan Z, Wang T. Effects of timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP on outcomes in patients with choledocholithiasis. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2022;77:e3667.

9. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Clinical guidelines for laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(8):3212-26.

10. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Clinical spotlight review: management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(3):987-95.

11. Ye X, Lin Z, Yu L, Xu T. Optimal timing of cholecystectomy in patients with choledocholithiasis after ERCP: a population-based study. Appl Sci. 2022;12(9):4574.

12. Gao J, Huang J, Xu Q. Meta-analysis of early vs delayed cholecystectomy post-ERCP. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(36):e34991.

13. Ali M, Khan S, Ahmed S. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2020;75:1-6.

14. Patel R, Singh H, Kumar A. Impact of timing on laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes post-ERCP. J Minim Access Surg. 2021;17(2):150-5.

15. Nguyen T, Tran L, Pham H. Early cholecystectomy after ERCP reduces complications: a prospective study. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022;26(1):45-50.

16. Omar M, Ali A, Youssef M. Timing of cholecystectomy after ERCP: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(3):741-8.

17. Kumar V, Sharma R, Gupta N. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy post-ERCP: a comparative study. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;12(8):345-52.

18. Lee S, Kim J, Park H. Outcomes of early cholecystectomy after ERCP in elderly patients. Geriatr Surg. 2021;3(1):25-30.

19. Singh P, Mehta N, Joshi A. Early cholecystectomy post-ERCP: benefits and challenges. Indian J Surg. 2022;84(2):123-8.

20. Chen L, Wang Y, Zhang X. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP: a retrospective analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023;23(1):89.

21. Tanaka K, Yamamoto M, Suzuki T. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy after ERCP: a Japanese multicenter study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021;28(5):321-7.

22. Garcia M, Lopez R, Hernandez J. Early cholecystectomy after ERCP reduces hospital stay: a randomized trial. Surg Today. 2020;50(4):345-50.

23. Ahmed Z, Khan M, Ali S. Comparative study of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy post-ERCP. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(3):789-94.

24. Wang H, Li J, Zhao Y. Early cholecystectomy after ERCP: a safe approach. Chin J Surg. 2022;60(2):101-5.

25. Rodriguez L, Martinez P, Gonzalez A. Timing of cholecystectomy after ERCP: impact on patient outcomes. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2020;112(9):678-83.

26. Khan A, Rahman S, Alam M. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP: a prospective study. Bangladesh J Surg. 2021;37(1):15-20.

27. Liu Y, Chen D, Zhang H. Early cholecystectomy after ERCP: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023;33(2):123-9.

Most read articles by the same author(s)