Breastfeeding Practices, Sociocultural Influences, and Health-System Factors Among Mothers in Rural Etawah, Uttar Pradesh: A Cross-Sectional Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Breastfeeding is a critical determinant of child survival and maternal health. Despite global and national policy commitments, suboptimal breastfeeding practices persist in rural India, driven by a complex interplay of sociocultural norms, health-system gaps, and knowledge deficits. Uttar Pradesh (UP) consistently records among the lowest exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates nationally, making community-level evidence urgently required.
Objectives: To assess breastfeeding initiation, exclusive breastfeeding rates, and reported sociocultural and health-system factors among mothers residing in rural Etawah district, Uttar Pradesh.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 99 eligible mothers with children aged 0 to 24 months attending the Rural Health Training Centre (RHTC), Department of Community Medicine, UPUMS, Saifai. Eligible mothers attending the RHTC outpatient department were consecutively recruited using purposive sampling during the study period. Data were collected using a pre-tested, structured interviewer-administered questionnaire on breastfeeding practices, reasons for delayed initiation or non-exclusive breastfeeding, supplementary feeding patterns, traditional beliefs, family support, and healthcare provider interactions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, and frequencies and proportions were reported.
Results: Antenatal care (ANC) coverage was 85.9%, and institutional delivery was reported in 92.9% of cases. Early initiation of breastfeeding within one hour of birth was observed among 65.7% of mothers, while 34.3% experienced delayed initiation, primarily due to maternal health issues (44.7%) and post-delivery fatigue (42.1%). Exclusive breastfeeding for six months was practiced by 70.4% of mothers (69/98). Among mothers who did not practice exclusive breastfeeding (n=29), perceived insufficient milk supply was the most commonly reported reason (51.9%). Traditional beliefs influenced breastfeeding practices in 12.4% of cases, with honey and gutti administration reported for religious and cultural reasons. Family support for breastfeeding was high (92.9%), and the mother-in-law emerged as the principal influencer of infant feeding decisions (68.5%). Healthcare providers discussed the benefits of breastfeeding with 79.6% of mothers, while 54.1% received breastfeeding-related educational materials.
Conclusion: While EBF rates and early initiation in this cohort appeared higher than state estimates, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the descriptive study design and purposive sampling. Perceived milk insufficiency, maternal fatigue, and traditional practices were commonly reported barriers. Strengthening frontline worker counselling, community-based demand generation, and family-inclusive lactation support may improve breastfeeding practices.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. World Health Organization. Breastfeeding. Geneva: WHO; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/breastfeeding
2. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475–490.
3. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2022.
4. Edmond KM, Zandoh C, Quigley MA, Amenga-Etego S, Owusu-Agyei S, Kirkwood BR. Delayed breastfeeding initiation increases risk of neonatal mortality. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):e380–e386.
5. Singh S, Rajput M, Agrawal A, Soni GP. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and its determinants among 0–6 months age children in urban slums of Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(6):2118–2122.
6. Upadhyay RP, Chinnakali P, Patro BK, Yadav K, Pandav CS, Krishnan A. High pre-lacteal feeding practices negate the positive effect of good antenatal care in ensuring optimal breastfeeding in northern India. Nutr J. 2012;11:57.
7. Dixit P, Ramkrishna, Singh K, Dwivedi LK. Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding intention among mothers of infants aged 0 to 6 months in Maharashtra, India. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021;11:100768.
8. Thakur N, Garg S, Thakur A, Ghosh AS. A community-based study on breastfeeding practices in rural Himachal Pradesh. Natl J Community Med. 2019;10(7):392–398.
9. Srivastava S, Sharma P, Kumar R. Factors influencing breastfeeding practices in rural Uttar Pradesh: a cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(3):1012–1017.
10. World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.
11. Agho KE, Orel R, Nath S, Raynes-Greenow C, Aldous P, Dibley MJ, et al. Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in India. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:854.
12. Chaturvedi P, Bansal R, Maheshwari MG. Breastfeeding practices in rural Uttar Pradesh: a hospital-based study. Indian J Pediatr. 2020;87(4):293–298.
13. Balogun OO, Dagvadorj A, Anigo KM, Ota E, Sasaki S. Factors influencing breastfeeding exclusivity during the first 6 months of life in developing countries: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2015;11(4):433–451.
14. Gatti L. Maternal perceptions of insufficient milk supply in breastfeeding. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008;40(4):355–363.
15. Raman S, Srinivasan K, Kurpad A, Razee H, Ritchie J. 'Nothing special, just normal delivery': bridging the gap between evidence and practice in maternal and neonatal care in India. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e105644.
16. Patel A, Banerjee A, Kaletwad A. Factors associated with prelacteal feeding and timely initiation of breastfeeding in hospital-delivered infants in India. J Hum Lact. 2013;29(4):572–578.
17. UNICEF. Breastfeeding: A Mother's Gift, for Every Child. New York: UNICEF; 2018.