Designing a gender-specific colour-coded waist circumference measuring tape- The Mishra’s Metabolic & Cellular Optimisation Risk Evaluation Dual Tape’ (M-CORE dual tape) as a public health innovation Tool for nutritional Screening in adults
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
Background: India, like many developing nations, experiences a ‘Double burden’ of malnutrition. Although Body Mass Index (BMI) is the standard method for classifying individuals' nutritional status, its user-friendliness and cardiometabolic risk prediction have come under scrutiny. Therefore, the search for alternative, scientifically tenable, simple, inexpensive, and easy-to-use and interpret screening tools, such as M-CORE dual tape, is underway.
Objectives:
- To evaluate the association between waist circumference and Body Mass Index (BMI), derive gender specific waist circumference categories corresponding to Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) BMI classifications, and determine the diagnostic performance of the defined categories in detecting the nutritional status of studied individuals.
- To develop a sex-specific colour-coded waist circumference measuring tape (M-CORE dual tape) for rapid nutritional screening.
Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study using a population-proportionate sampling technique was conducted to enroll 528 adults from six villages in the rural field practice area of the Department of Community Medicine, of R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, using data collected under the Community Adoption Programme for Postgraduates (CAPP), a unique community-oriented academic initiative of the institution. Under this programme, postgraduate students adopted villages and conducted comprehensive community health surveys, including anthropometric assessment and screening for abdominal obesity. Height, weight, waist circumference, and hip circumference. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated and classified according to the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines. Waist circumference values were stratified into percentiles, and the association between waist circumference percentile categories and BMI categories was evaluated. The relationship was further examined using the Chi-square test, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and binary logistic regression. The diagnostic performance of waist circumference and BMI for identifying overweight and obesity was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the findings were used to develop/propose a gender-specific colour-coded waist circumference measuring tape: ‘Mishra’s M-CORE dual tape’ for nutritional screening.
Results: Among 528 participants, 232 (43.9%) were male, and 296 (56.1%) were female. The average ages were 49.59 (± 16.66) for males, 51.58 (± 16.75) for females, and 48.06 (± 16.43) overall. The waist circumference percentile categories for the overall study population, as well as for male and female participants, showed very strong associations with ICMR-based BMI grades. This was determined using the Fisher–Freeman–Halton Test (p < 0.001, 0.05, and 0.001) and one-way ANOVA (p < 0.001). In the regression analysis, the findings for the overweight and obese categories were significant (odds ratio of 5.83 - 56.00, p < 0.05- 0.001). The ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis yielded positive results, with AUCs ranging from 0.53 to 0.75 across all nutritional grade categories based on county-specific (India) BMI and the proposed waist circumference categories (grades). The analysis placed particular emphasis on gender-specific waist circumference measurements, which were found to have predictive potential (AUC) near equal and at some places better than their corresponding BMI.
For males, the proposed categories(grades) are < 74 cm: severely thin, 74–77 cm: Mildly thin, 77–83cm: Normal, 83–90 cm: Overweight, 90-100 cm: Obesity grade 1, and> 100 cm: Obesity grade 2. For females, ≤76 cm: Severely thin, 76–79cm: Mildly thin, 79–84cm: Normal, 84–90cm: Overweight, 90- 96 cm: Obesity grade 1, and> 96 cm: Obesity grade 2.
Conclusion: Based on the above observations, a gender-specific colour-coded, simple-to-use waist circumference measuring tape (The Mishra’s M-CORE dual tape) is proposed for further testing and recommendation for use in different healthcare settings.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
References
1. Chaudhuri,S., Kumar, Y., Nirupama, A. Y., & Agiwal, V. (2023). Examining the prevalence and patterns of malnutrition among children aged 0–3 in India: Comparative insights from NFHS-1 to NFHS-5. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 24, 101450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101450
2. Dhoop, P., & Dhoop, V. (2024, January). Another hole in India's data tapestry. DeccanHerald. https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/another-hole-in-india-s-data-tapestry-1236439.html
3. Edunovations.(2026, June). NFHS-6 report 2024: Key findings on health, nutrition and immunisation in India explained. Edunovations Current Affairs. https://edunovations.com/currentaffairs/national/nfhs-6-report-2024/
4. Forum on Open Food Facts. (2024). Economic Survey 2023–24 flags obesity as a major threat to India's health. https://forum.openfoodfacts.org/t/economic-survey-2023-24-flags-obesity-as-a-major-threat-to-indias-health/627
5. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, & International Institute for Population Sciences. (2026). National Family Health Survey-6(NFHS-6), 2023–24: India fact sheet. IIPS. http://rchiips.org/nfhs/
6. Modi, B., Sheth, A., & Panchani, R. (2024). Decoding malnutrition trends in India: A comprehensive analysis using National Family Health Survey data for informed strategies and interventions. NMO Journal, 17(2), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.4103/jnmo.jnmo_8_23
7. Outlook India. (2026, May). NFHS-6: Southern states lead India's diabetes and obesity rankings. Outlook India. https://www.outlookindia.com/national/nfhs-6-southern-states-lead-indias-diabetes-and-obesity-rankings
8. Press Information Bureau, Government of India. (2022). Malnourished children[Press release]. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1806601
9. Preethi,V., Hemalatha, V., Arlappa, N., Thomas, M. B., & Jaleel, A. (2024). Trends and predictors of severe and moderate anaemia among children aged 6–59 months in India: An analysis of three rounds of National Family Health Survey (NFHS)data. BMC Public Health, 24, Article 2875. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20328-9
10. ORF(Observer Research Foundation). (2025, January 9). Anaemia in India: A silent public health crisis. ORF Expert Speak. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/anaemia-in-india-a-silent-public-health-crisis
11. Siddiqui,M. Z., Donato, K., & Bhagat, R. (2025). Understanding the dynamics of malnutrition dichotomy in India: Trends and insights from the National FamilyHealth Surveys. SSM – Population Health, 29, 101938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101938 (ScienceDirect/ PMC)
12. Singh,J. K., Chiero, V., Kriina, M., Alee, N. T., & Chauhan, K. (2022).Identifying the trend of persistent cluster of stunting, wasting, and underweight among children under five years in northeastern states of India. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 18, 101158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101158
13. The Federal. (2026, May). 'Anaemia mukt' to 'data mukt': How health survey NFHS-6 hides the truth. The Federal. https://thefederal.com/category/health/anaemia-mukt-india-health-survy-nfhs-6-fact-sheet-245037
14 Nadiger N, Anantharamu S, CN P, Vidal-Puig A, Mukhopadhyay A. Unique attributes of obesity in India: A narrative review. Obes Med [Internet]. 2022 Oct 1 [cited 2026 Jul 11];35:100454. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7615800/
15 Sweatt K, Garvey WT, Martins C. Strengths and Limitations of BMI in the Diagnosis of Obesity: What is the Path Forward? Curr Obes Rep [Internet]. 2024 Sep 1 [cited 2026 Jul 11];13(3):584–95. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38958869/
16 Misra A, Vikram NK, Ghosh A, Ranjan P GSIOCM. Revised definition of obesity in Asian Indians living in India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2025;19(1).
17 Singh PN, Arthur KN, Orlich MJ, James W, Purty A, Job JS, et al. Global epidemiology of obesity, vegetarian dietary patterns, and noncommunicable disease in Asian Indians. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul 1;100(SUPPL. 1).
18 Ross R, Neeland IJ, Yamashita S, Shai I, Seidell J, Magni P, et al. Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol [Internet]. 2020 Mar 1 [cited 2026 Jul 11];16(3):177–89. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32020062/
19 Van Den Munckhof ICL, Holewijn S, De Graaf J, Rutten JHW. Sex differences in fat distribution influence the association between BMI and arterial stiffness. J Hypertens [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2026 Jul 11];35(6):1219–25. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28441693/
20 R K, Harshitha, Bhargava M. Mid-upper arm circumference and neck circumference to screen for overweight-obesity in young adults in South India. Heliyon [Internet]. 2022 Dec 1 [cited 2026 Jul 11];8(12). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36578410/
21 Chawada BL, Devaliya JJ, Kurian S. Validity of “Mid-Upper Arm Circumference” as a Parameter to Identify Undernourished Children in Rural Gujarat. Indian J Community Med [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Jul 11];49(3):475–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38933793/
22 Sinha N, Mishra B, Mishra G. Policy and Program Pioneering public health through - “ Community Adoption Program for Postgraduates .” Cent India J Med Res. 2025;4(3):45–6.
23 ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Jul 11]. DIETARY GUIDELINES FOR INDIANS. Available from: https://www.nin.res.in/dietaryguidelines/
24 Shri N, Singh S, Singh A. Prevalence and Predictors of Combined Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference Among Indian Adults. Int J Public Health [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2026 Jul 11];68. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37065643/
25 Venkatrao M, Nagarathna R, Patil SS, Singh A, Rajesh SK, Nagendra H. A composite of BMI and waist circumference may be a better obesity metric in Indians with high risk for type 2 diabetes: An analysis of NMB-2017, a nationwide cross-sectional study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract [Internet]. 2020 Mar 1 [cited 2026 Jul 11];161. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32004696/
26 Tutunchi H, Ebrahimi-Mameghani M, Ostadrahimi A, Asghari-Jafarabadi M. What are the optimal cut-off points of anthropometric indices for prediction of overweight and obesity? Predictive validity of waist circumference, waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios. Heal Promot Perspect [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2026 Jul 11];10(2):142–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32296627/
27 Macek P, Biskup M, Terek-Derszniak M, Krol H, Smok-Kalwat J, Gozdz S, et al. Optimal cut-off values for anthropometric measures of obesity in screening for cardiometabolic disorders in adults. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020 Dec 1 [cited 2026 Jul 11];10(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32647283/
28 Balkau B, Deanfield JE, Després JP, Bassand JP, Fox KAA, Smith SC, et al. International Day for the Evaluation of Abdominal Obesity (IDEA): a study of waist circumference, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus in 168,000 primary care patients in 63 countries. Circulation [Internet]. 2007 Oct [cited 2026 Jul 11];116(17):1942–51. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17965405/
29 Sommer I, Teufer B, Szelag M, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Titscher V, Klerings I, et al. The performance of anthropometric tools to determine obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020 Dec 1 [cited 2026 Jul 11];10(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32728050/
30 Castle AC, Hoeppner SS, Manne-Goehler JM, Olivier S, Magodoro IM, Singh U, et al. Identifying sex-specific anthropometric measures and thresholds for dysglycemia screening in an HIV-endemic rural South African population. PLOS Glob Public Heal [Internet]. 2023 Oct 1 [cited 2026 Jul 11];3(10):e0001698. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10610455/
31 SV M, Nitin K, Sambit D, Nishant R, Sanjay K, India) (on behalf of Endocrine Society of. ESI Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Obesity In India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab [Internet]. 2022 Jul [cited 2026 Jul 11];26(4):295. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9519829/
32 Karmakar A, Garg S, Dasgupta A, Paul B, Maharana SP. Sensitivity and specificity of waist circumference as a single screening tool for assessment of overweight and obesity. Int J Community Med Public Heal [Internet]. 2017 Oct 25 [cited 2026 Jul 11];4(11):4254–8. Available from: https://www.ijcmph.com/index.php/ijcmph/article/view/2035
33 R K, Harshitha, Bhargava M. Mid-upper arm circumference and neck circumference to screen for overweight-obesity in young adults in South India. Heliyon [Internet]. 2022 Dec 1 [cited 2026 Jul 11];8(12):e12173. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9791811/
34 Shifraw T, Selling K, Worku A, Berhane HY, Ekström EC, Berhane Y. Mid-upper arm circumference for identifying adult overweight in large-scale population-based surveys: empirical evaluation using data of the EAT Addis study, Ethiopia. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2021 Dec 2 [cited 2026 Jul 11];11(12). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857561/