EFFECTIVENESS OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS SELF-SAMPLING INTERVENTIONS FOR INCREASING CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING UPTAKE IN LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains a major public health problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where screening coverage is often inadequate and contributes substantially to disease burden and mortality. Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling has emerged as a promising strategy to overcome barriers associated with conventional facility-based screening methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of HPV self-sampling interventions in increasing cervical cancer screening uptake among women residing in LMICs. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and regional databases up to December 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing HPV self-sampling with standard cervical cancer screening methods were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and synthesized evidence. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. Five randomized controlled trials involving 9,746 women met the inclusion criteria. Screening uptake was significantly higher among women offered HPV self-sampling compared with those receiving standard screening approaches (pooled OR 4.24; 95% CI: 3.88–4.65). Overall screening completion rates were 81.0% in the self-sampling group and 50.1% in the standard screening group, representing a substantial absolute improvement. Moderate heterogeneity was observed across studies (I²=29.9%). Findings remained consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and no significant publication bias was detected. The available evidence demonstrated that HPV self-sampling markedly improved cervical cancer screening uptake in LMICs. Incorporation of self-sampling strategies into national cervical cancer screening programs may substantially enhance screening coverage and contribute to reductions in cervical cancer-related morbidity and mortality in resource-constrained settings.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49.
2. Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Bray F. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(15):3262-73.
3. Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, et al. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Human papillomavirus and related diseases in the world. Summary Report 2019. Barcelona: ICO/IARC; 2019.
4. Black E, Hyslop F, Richmond R. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):108.
5. Lim JN, Ojo AA. Barriers to utilisation of cervical cancer screening in Sub Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017;26(1):e12444.
6. Koliopoulos G, Nyaga VN, Santesso N, Bryant A, Martin-Hirsch PP, Mustafa RA, et al. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8(8):CD008587.
7. Arbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders PJ, Verhoef VM, Suonio E, Dillner L, et al. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):172-83.
8. Sultana F, English DR, Simpson JA, Drennan KT, Mullins R, Brotherton JM, et al. Home-based HPV self-sampling improves participation by never-screened and under-screened women: results from a large randomized trial (iPap) in Australia. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(2):281-90.
9. Arbyn M, Smith SB, Temin S, Sultana F, Castle P. Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses. BMJ. 2018;363:k4823.
10. Yeh PT, Kennedy CE, de Vuyst H, Narasimhan M. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(3):e001351.
11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
12. World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups [Internet]. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 15]. Available from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519
13. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
14. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177-88.
15. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-60.
16. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629-34.
17. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-6.
18. Gizaw M, Teka B, Ruddies F, Abebe T, Kaufmann AM, Worku A, et al. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in Ethiopia by self-sampling HPV DNA compared to visual inspection with acetic acid: a cluster randomized trial. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019;12(6):399-408.
19. Mwenda V, Mwangi A, Nyongesa C, Kiarie H, Kiptoo M, Wakhungu B, et al. Effectiveness of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer. 2020;147(8):2212-21.
20. Bhatla N, Singhal S, Dhamija D, Mathur S, Natarajan J, Sharma S, et al. HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in India: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(7):e1026-34.
21. Nakalembe M, Banura C, Namujju PB, Mirembe FM. Community-based HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in Uganda: a randomized trial. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1456.
22. Mwaiselage J, Mchome B, Ngoma T, Kahesa C, Mgaya H, Mwaiselage W, et al. HPV self-collection for cervical cancer screening in Tanzania: results from a randomized controlled trial. Afr J Reprod Health. 2023;27(2):89-98.
23. Landy R, Pesola F, Castañón A, Sasieni P. Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2016;115(9):1140-6.
24. Orang’o EO, Wachira J, Asirwa FC, Busakhala N, Naanyu V, Kisuya J, et al. Factors associated with uptake of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for cervical cancer screening in Western Kenya. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157217.
25. Rosser JI, Njoroge B, Huchko MJ. Changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cervical cancer screening: the effects of an educational intervention in rural Kenya. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(7):884-9.
26. Asgary R, Adongo PB, Nwameme A, Cole HVS, Maya E, Liu M, et al. mHealth to train community health nurses in visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening in Ghana. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016;20(3):239-42.
27. Modibbo FI, Dareng E, Bamisaye P, Jedy-Agba E, Adewole A, Oyeneyin L, et al. Qualitative study of barriers to cervical cancer screening among Nigerian women. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e008533.
28. Khanna D, Khargekar N, Budukh A. Knowledge, attitude, and practice about cervical cancer and its screening among community healthcare workers of Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh, India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(5):1715-9.
29. Canfell K, Kim JJ, Brisson M, Keane A, Simms KT, Caruana M, et al. Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):591-603.
30. Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Temin S, Denny L, Gupta V, Kim JJ, et al. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer: ASCO resource-stratified clinical practice guideline. J Glob Oncol. 2017;3(5):635-57.
31. Lim JN, Ojo AA. Barriers to utilisation of cervical cancer screening in Sub Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017;26(1):e12444.
32. Finocchario-Kessler S, Wexler C, Maloba M, Mabachi N, Ndikum-Moffor F, Bukusi E. Cervical cancer prevention and treatment research in Africa: a systematic review from a public health perspective. BMC Womens Health. 2016;16:29.
33. Musa J, Achenbach CJ, O’Dwyer LC, Evans CT, McHugh M, Hou L, et al. Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0183924.
34. Arbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders PJ, Verhoef VM, Suonio E, Dillner L, et al. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):172-83.
35. Campos NG, Tsu V, Jeronimo J, Mvundura M, Kim JJ. Estimating the value of point-of-care HPV testing in three low- and middle-income countries: a modeling study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e011301.
36. World Health Organization. WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention, second edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.